The American Humanist Association has withdrawn its ‘Humanist of the year’ award to British scientist Richard Dawkins.
The hysteria comes after Dawkins made a tweet in which he compared the case of the monumentally crazy Rachel Dolezal, who spent years identifying as a ‘black woman,’ and those men or women who decide they are the opposite sex.
‘In 2015, Rachel Dolezal, a white chapter president of NAACP, was vilified for identifying as Black,’ wrote Dawkins on Twitter. ‘Some men choose to identify as women, and some women choose to identify as men. You will be vilified if you deny that they literally are what they identify as. Discuss.’
Dawkins would have to be tremendously naive not to realise the ensuing backlash.
During the cancellation process, the ‘AHA’ board said the post by Dawkins ‘implies that the identities of transgender individuals are fraudulent, while also simultaneously attacking Black identity as one that can be assumed when convenient’.
This is an interpretation. Another is that, if it is just as valid for a person to play the ‘transgender’ game, it is just as reasonable for somebody to play the ‘transrace’ game, in which we all pretend we are whatever we feel like.
This may be where Dawkins’ line of argument was heading, but that would obviously cause too much cognitive dissonance for the hopelessly brain-polluted.
We here at The Creativity Movement have always made a careful distinction between Richard Dawkins the scientist and Richard Dawkins the philosopher.
We are loathe to quote a decrepit old muddle head and peddler of fairytales, but we feel former Archbishop Rowan Williams put it well when he said Richard Dawkins is a ‘good scientist’ but a really ‘bad philosopher’.
We have to concur. The observations of the natural world made by Richard Dawkins the scientist are accurate. We believe they are in harmony with our view of the reality.
However, the social proclamations made by Dawkins are a different animal altogether, in harmony with the degenerate evil that plagues, torments and destroys our society.
Mr Dawkins urged us to ‘rebel against our genes’ which want more copies of themselves in the population (despite that each one of us is physically a scoop from our gene pool).
He might as well throw science under the bus and agree with the LGBTQ+ agenda in any way that gives the finger to genetic facts.
Dawkins started on that road and may as well go all the way surely? We expect he still doesn’t see where the ‘wokeness’ is all leading.
Richard Dawkins is a coward who has sadly lost his mind in his attempts to distance himself from the gold revealed in his excellent book “The Selfish Gene”.
Anti-White Marxists want nothing more than to destroy that message and the messenger.